|
Post by Christy Smith on Feb 9, 2009 18:32:21 GMT -5
Do you think that the other person worked harder to get here than you? Why or why not? Good luck both of you. Hey Alex So to answer your question. In all honesty, and I love <3 Daniel. But in honesty, no I don't think Daniel worked harder than I did to get here. Daniel was on Tambaqui, the tribe that continued to dominate. He only had to go to a Tribe TC once! I had to go to 3 in a row right at the beginning. I was an outsider on the girls tribe, so surviving 3 in a row, especially when I missed a chance to help the girls out in one challenge, and still survive that (when Janet was eliminated) was a miracle. On the original Tambaqui, I had to work my ass off in the challenges, to Tambaqui, that though I was an outsider girl, I deserved to stay longer than some of the inactive men on the tribe. (The reason I worked my ass off in the fish challenge) When it came merge, I still was an outsider, I had to work hard in challenges, and yes I was weak in challenges, because they were always on during my night classes. But even in Daniel/Roger's allience, I was on the bottom of that. The whole game I was in the bottom tier of each tribe rank. Even at the end. So to summarize, I believe I worked harder than Daniel to get here because I was of a minority the entire game.
|
|
|
Post by Daniel Lue on Feb 9, 2009 18:40:47 GMT -5
Do you think that the other person worked harder to get here than you? Why or why not? Good luck both of you. I honestly thik that the body of work that we both did in this game was entirelydiffrent. Christy was a underdog, she fought her way to where she is but had allotof elp allong the way. Their was points allong the way that chrisy's head was on the chopping block and twice she was saved inpart to me rallying to get the votes to keep her. I played the harder game since I had a major target on my back. Once you saw me playing cut throat, I was shocked that no one banned toghter to vote me out. Being the person that played the most out front game, recieving 0 votes against me proves that I played the game better. Lets face it behind roger, there was a point where I was the number 2 challange threat, I was awalys the number one strategical threat since as everyone knew I was alinged to practially everyone, and I played the most upfront game playing cut throat and still playing by my morals. Toanswer this question I played a harder game due to the fact that I was awalys the biggest threat left in the game without immunity every week but 2 when alex went on his immunity run, and I survived.
|
|
|
Post by Christy Smith on Feb 9, 2009 18:46:36 GMT -5
Mine is easy. Rank the jurors on Gameplay and say why. Hehe, the ol rank em question. Quite common, but one of my favs ;D My list will be 1-7 with 1 being on the top. And I rank based on how well I know you, and how socially strategic you were or physically strong 1. Dave- I knew you quite well, and I knew you were playing the game. Out of the jurors, I see you as playing the most strategic, which is why you get the top spot. Though I guess it was this extreme strategizing that caused you're ouster 2. Roger- Always honest with me. You were the strongest physical threat. However, I didn't see you as big of a social strategist. But you had determination, and I admire that. 3. Alex- I rank you high, because though I didn't get to know you as much. Man you surprised me at the end of the game. I thought you a floater, but you came out and started to dominate the challenges. Which shows me you really were into the game. 4. Heidi- Heidi, you were in the shadows like I was. however, I didn't see much strategic thinking, and you weren't the strongest. However, you're up here in the top 4 because you were always honest, and never lied. I love honest players 5. Matthew- Matthew, you were a nice guy. But I'll be honest, I never got to know much about you. Partially it was my fault, but you seemed like the friends with everyone, which added a nice air to the game at times. However, I could tell you were dedicated to the game. 6. Rob- you sent a blackmail pm which I really didn't like, but it showed me you were playing the game. However, like Matthew I didn't get to know much about you. 7. Ryan- I didn't know about you at all this game. What your strategy was in this game. You seemed like you were just riding Dave and Alex's coatails, and following what they would say. Also your immaturity at times made the game a bit unfun. I'm sorry if people get upset where I placed them, and it was had deciding the top spot. I just went with how strategic people played, and how well I knew you.
|
|
|
Post by Daniel Lue on Feb 9, 2009 19:20:11 GMT -5
Mine is easy. Rank the jurors on Gameplay and say why. well this is my rank in reverse order 7) Rob- the only reason you made jurry was becausetheir were bigger fish to frye, I wish that your heart was more into the game but since it wasn't thats why your number 7. 6)Ryan- You played the game laching on to others, you never wanted to make any tough decisions on your own and you wanted to hide and make it to the end on luck not strategy or skill, better luck in next game. 5)dave- you didnt really have the chance to really stake your place in this game, your at this spot since I viewed you as my biggest threat for winning last season and the fact that you were aligned with enough people to be my major chllange in this game. 4) matt you played the floater stratgy to a tee but you never actually formed any real alliance so yo had no one to help you to the final 2 3) Hedi- if it wasnt to a botched vote out attempt to get out ryan since roger messed up with not checking his pms in time, you would of made it at least to th final 4. You had a good mix of strength, strategy, and you were a great underdog. 2) roger- You were the ultimate challange threat but you weren;t much beyond that. I loved your game play but you never jumped out to make a move of your own when it came to vote offs so therefore you had a great challange game but you lacked in the socil department. 1) Alex- You played a great game dude, you won when you needed to and you played a extraordinary game and a nice social game as well, you were the most complete gamer in the jurry
|
|
|
Post by Heidi Strobel on Feb 9, 2009 21:23:11 GMT -5
Thank you for your answers, you two.
|
|
|
Post by Christy Smith on Feb 9, 2009 21:43:48 GMT -5
no prob Heidi
|
|
|
Post by Roger Sexton on Feb 9, 2009 22:21:34 GMT -5
All of my questions have already been answered by Christy & Daniel, so I am ready to vote. Congrats on a Great F2... you are the best two players this season (in my opinion).
|
|
|
Post by Christy Smith on Feb 9, 2009 22:26:54 GMT -5
well thanks Roger
|
|
|
Post by Daniel Lue on Feb 9, 2009 23:50:42 GMT -5
thnks hedi and roger
|
|
|
Post by Jeff Probst on Feb 10, 2009 17:24:48 GMT -5
Ryan & Rob need to ask questions. If Rob goes MIA for X amount of days (probably by tomorrow night), Shawna will replace him.
|
|
|
Post by Shawna Mitchell on Feb 10, 2009 17:36:57 GMT -5
:-D yay!
|
|
|
Post by Ryan Aiken on Feb 10, 2009 19:18:03 GMT -5
Congrats Christy and Daniel. I'm not gonna be a bitch, but I do have one thing for you too. You must explain what you think: Your past determines your future means to you. Good luck and Congrats once again
|
|
|
Post by Daniel Lue on Feb 10, 2009 20:52:38 GMT -5
Congrats Christy and Daniel. I'm not gonna be a bitch, but I do have one thing for you too. You must explain what you think: Your past determines your future means to you. Good luck and Congrats once again Good question. To me this statement means what yo'v done in the past is what your going to get in the future. So at thispoint in the game it is really important to look at the body of one's game to determine if they deserve it more. It istrue that I did bretray people but in a honest way, isn't betrail one of the biggest factrs in survivor anyways. I played the best game in lines of social since I got 0 votes against me and let me ask everyone A question, when you saw me playing a game where I was cunning and basically aligned with everyone, wouldn't someone try to take me out especially when people started to end up in the jury because of my actions one way or another? So basically this question means that everyone that votes should base their vote on the quality of ones game and not on personal reasons. Because domaniting a game in most facets is rare, and he fact that I didn't receive one vote against me should be proff enough that I deserve to win. With the type of game I played getting 0 votesagainst me was mind boggling and proof enough that I held all the cards and my hands through out the game and manuplited them to my likeing
|
|
|
Post by Christy Smith on Feb 10, 2009 21:33:13 GMT -5
Congrats Christy and Daniel. I'm not gonna be a bitch, but I do have one thing for you too. You must explain what you think: Your past determines your future means to you. Good luck and Congrats once again Hehe, this phrase is very similar to the motto I use in life, "Your actions are like a mirror, they reflect back on you" What the phrase you gave Ryan means, that the actions you make on yourself and those around you, no matter what they are, will effect you in the future. The things you say to people, etc. How this applies to me is the actions I took were always honest. The people I aligned with I always stayed true to, and as such, they would do the same to me. They say in survivor backstabbing and betraying tend to be necessary. But I got here without betraying or lying to anyone. Those I helped in voting out, were either because I had no choice, or that I didn't know them well enough to feel like I betrayed them, or felt guilty. Those were my actions, to stay honest and true. It helped me out being the underdog all the time. Being honest 100% of the time, meant people could take what I said seriously and know I wasn't gonna backstab them. A Big ramble, but I hope I hit what you were looking for Ryan. Thanks for the question
|
|
|
Post by Christy Smith on Feb 11, 2009 15:27:52 GMT -5
Ok, I saw Rob was on this morning. Has he already voted? Cause he didn't post anything here, not even a comment.
|
|